His Dark Materials, Book I: The Golden Compass
written and read by Philip Pullman (with a full cast) is a dark children’s novel of the type more reminiscent of 19th century morality literature than modern children’s novels. The book captures attention, but the characters are not very sympathetic.


I know this book is beloved by many, and I honestly enjoyed it, but I did not like any of the characters. They all came across as selfish, self-centered power mongers – even the main character of Lyra. Strangely, this did not diminish from my liking the novel – and being anxious to listen to the next two.
Lyra (and her daemon) is a wild creature – neglected and mistreated in some ways. Loved and doted upon in other ways. We learn how her life started and that she is a child of destiny – to even determine destiny. Some of the book actually made me cringe at the Lovecraftian references that may not have been intentional. There are parts of the book that make me think of the battle Lovecraft had against the Elder Gods in his own books. (I realize not many people will even acknowledge the possibility of the influence.) I do not see a major influence from Tolkien, more of a diatribe against C.S. Lewis.
Now, I am somewhat familiar with the religious rigamorale around the atheistic themes of the series, His Dark Materials. Perhaps I was expecting some great blasphemy in the book. The thing is, I started giggling when I heard the explanation of “Dust.” It is such an utterly immature and ill-informed argument about original sin, that I could not have taken it seriously when I was 10 years old. (I believe that is the target audience for this book?) The original sin argument is not an unfamiliar one to those who have read the Church Fathers, for that matter. (There is an actual theological schism due to the time when original sin comes upon human beings.)
Now, granted, I had an excellent religious education so I may be unusual, but if you are a Christian and your child can be swayed by such a ridiculously simplistic theological statement as the basis for Pullman’s anti-god theses, well, you have deeper issues. And since “dust” is the main characteristic within the series, well, if you cannot think of it as anything but something for which you must suspend disbelief, your own belief system is in no danger.
This is a major flaw within this book, after all, if he set it in an Asgardian or Grecian mythology / theology, it would not create anywhere near the controversy.
The book does not have a happy ending. It ends in an unintentional betrayal – and not the one I was rooting to have happen. It really doesn’t have an ending. It sets up the next book which, when I finally get to get home I plan on grabbing and listening to!